I am facing a strange behavior of the round[] function:
for i in range[1, 15, 2]:
n = i / 2
print[n, "=>", round[n]]
This code prints:
0.5 => 0
1.5 => 2
2.5 => 2
3.5 => 4
4.5 => 4
5.5 => 6
6.5 => 6
I expected the floating values to be always rounded up, but instead, it is rounded to the nearest even number.
Why such behavior, and what is the best way to get the correct result?
I tried to use the fractions but the result is the same.
martineau
115k25 gold badges160 silver badges284 bronze badges
asked Oct 8, 2015 at 15:11
4
The Numeric Types section documents this behaviour explicitly:
round[x[, n]]
x rounded to n digits, rounding half to even. If n is omitted, it defaults to 0.
Note the rounding half to even. This is also called bankers rounding; instead of always rounding up or down [compounding rounding errors], by rounding to the nearest even number you average out rounding errors.
If you need more control over the rounding behaviour, use the decimal module, which lets you specify exactly what rounding strategy should be used.
For example, to round up from half:
>>> from decimal import localcontext, Decimal, ROUND_HALF_UP
>>> with localcontext[] as ctx:
... ctx.rounding = ROUND_HALF_UP
... for i in range[1, 15, 2]:
... n = Decimal[i] / 2
... print[n, '=>', n.to_integral_value[]]
...
0.5 => 1
1.5 => 2
2.5 => 3
3.5 => 4
4.5 => 5
5.5 => 6
6.5 => 7
answered Oct 8, 2015 at 15:24
Martijn Pieters♦Martijn Pieters
987k274 gold badges3881 silver badges3239 bronze badges
3
For example:
from decimal import Decimal, ROUND_HALF_UP
Decimal[1.5].quantize[0, ROUND_HALF_UP]
# This also works for rounding to the integer part:
Decimal[1.5].to_integral_value[rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP]
answered Oct 8, 2015 at 15:28
dhobbsdhobbs
3,1171 gold badge17 silver badges18 bronze badges
You can use this:
import math
def normal_round[n]:
if n - math.floor[n] < 0.5:
return math.floor[n]
return math.ceil[n]
It will round number up or down properly.
answered Dec 18, 2016 at 7:20
fedor2612fedor2612
4214 silver badges6 bronze badges
2
round[] will round either up or down, depending on if the number is even or odd. A simple way to only round up is:
int[num + 0.5]
If you want this to work properly for negative numbers use:
[[num > 0] - [num < 0]] * int[abs[num] + 0.5]
Note, this can mess up for large numbers or really precise numbers like 5000000000000001.0 and
0.49999999999999994.
answered Jul 31, 2017 at 19:51
3
The behavior you are seeing is typical IEEE 754 rounding behavior. If it has to choose between two numbers that are equally different from the input, it always picks the even one. The advantage of this behavior is that the average rounding effect is zero - equally many numbers round up and down. If you round the half way numbers in a consistent direction the rounding will affect the expected value.
The behavior you are seeing is correct if the objective is fair rounding, but that is not always what is needed.
One trick to get the type of rounding you want is to add 0.5 and then take the floor. For example, adding 0.5 to 2.5 gives 3, with floor 3.
answered Oct 8, 2015 at 15:24
0
Love the fedor2612 answer. I expanded it with an optional "decimals" argument for those who want to use this function to round any number of decimals [say for example if you want to round a currency $26.455 to $26.46].
import math
def normal_round[n, decimals=0]:
expoN = n * 10 ** decimals
if abs[expoN] - abs[math.floor[expoN]] < 0.5:
return math.floor[expoN] / 10 ** decimals
return math.ceil[expoN] / 10 ** decimals
oldRounding = round[26.455,2]
newRounding = normal_round[26.455,2]
print[oldRounding]
print[newRounding]
Output:
26.45
26.46
answered Oct 2, 2018 at 23:47
Joe CatJoe Cat
1591 silver badge8 bronze badges
1
Why make it so complicated?
def HalfRoundUp[value]:
return int[value + 0.5]
You could of course make it into a lambda which would be:
HalfRoundUp = lambda value: int[value + 0.5]
answered Jun 20, 2021 at 22:50
TeaCoastTeaCoast
1861 silver badge10 bronze badges
3
Short version: use the decimal module. It can represent numbers like 2.675 precisely, unlike Python floats where 2.675 is really 2.67499999999999982236431605997495353221893310546875 [exactly]. And you can specify the rounding you desire: ROUND_CEILING, ROUND_DOWN, ROUND_FLOOR, ROUND_HALF_DOWN, ROUND_HALF_EVEN, ROUND_HALF_UP, ROUND_UP, and ROUND_05UP are all options.
answered Oct 8, 2015 at 15:20
rmunnrmunn
33.2k9 gold badges71 silver badges103 bronze badges
0
Rounding to the nearest even number has become common practice in numerical disciplines. "Rounding up" produces a slight bias towards larger results.
So, from the perspective of the scientific establishment, round has the correct behavior.
answered Oct 8, 2015 at 15:19
MRocklinMRocklin
53.2k21 gold badges146 silver badges220 bronze badges
1
In
the question this is basically an issue when dividing a positive integer by 2. The easisest way is int[n + 0.5] for individual numbers.
However we cannot apply this to series, therefore what we then can do for example for a pandas dataframe, and without going into loops, is:
import numpy as np
df['rounded_division'] = np.where[df['some_integer'] % 2 == 0, round[df['some_integer']/2,0], round[[df['some_integer']+1]/2,0]]
answered Jul 11, 2019 at 9:40
A small addition as the rounding half up with some of the solutions might not work as expected in some cases.
Using the function from above for instance:
from decimal import Decimal, ROUND_HALF_UP
def round_half_up[x: float, num_decimals: int] -> float:
if num_decimals < 0:
raise ValueError["Num decimals needs to be at least 0."]
target_precision = "1." + "0" * num_decimals
rounded_x = float[Decimal[x].quantize[Decimal[target_precision], ROUND_HALF_UP]]
return rounded_x
round_half_up[1.35, 1]
1.4
round_half_up[4.35, 1]
4.3
Where I was expecting 4.4. What did the trick for me was converting x into a string first.
from decimal import Decimal, ROUND_HALF_UP
def round_half_up[x: float, num_decimals: int] -> float:
if num_decimals < 0:
raise ValueError["Num decimals needs to be at least 0."]
target_precision = "1." + "0" * num_decimals
rounded_x = float[Decimal[str[x]].quantize[Decimal[target_precision], ROUND_HALF_UP]]
return rounded_x
round_half_up[4.35, 1]
4.4
answered Jun 15, 2021 at 7:50
dodgedodge
311 silver badge4 bronze badges
Here is another solution. It will work as normal rounding in excel.
from decimal import Decimal, getcontext, ROUND_HALF_UP
round_context = getcontext[]
round_context.rounding = ROUND_HALF_UP
def c_round[x, digits, precision=5]:
tmp = round[Decimal[x], precision]
return float[tmp.__round__[digits]]
c_round[0.15, 1] -> 0.2, c_round[0.5, 0] -> 1
answered Nov 15, 2018 at 23:18
discoverdiscover
3591 gold badge4 silver badges14 bronze badges
1
The following
solution achieved "school fashion rounding" without using the decimal module [which turns out to be slow].
def school_round[a_in,n_in]:
''' python uses "banking round; while this round 0.05 up" '''
if [a_in * 10 ** [n_in + 1]] % 10 == 5:
return round[a_in + 1 / 10 ** [n_in + 1], n_in]
else:
return round[a_in, n_in]
e.g.
print[round[0.005,2]] # 0
print[school_round[0.005,2]] #0.01
answered Dec 20, 2018 at 15:51
So just to make sure there is a crystal clear working example here, I wrote a small convenience function
def round_half_up[x: float, num_decimals: int] -> float:
"""Use explicit ROUND HALF UP. See references, for an explanation.
This is the proper way to round, as taught in school.
Args:
x:
num_decimals:
Returns:
//stackoverflow.com/questions/33019698/how-to-properly-round-up-half-float-numbers-in-python
"""
if num_decimals < 0:
raise ValueError["Num decimals needs to be at least 0."]
target_precision = "1." + "0" * num_decimals
rounded_x = float[Decimal[x].quantize[Decimal[target_precision], ROUND_HALF_UP]]
return rounded_x
And an appropriate set of test cases
def test_round_half_up[]:
x = 1.5
y = round_half_up[x, 0]
assert y == 2.0
y = round_half_up[x, 1]
assert y == 1.5
x = 1.25
y = round_half_up[x, 1]
assert y == 1.3
y = round_half_up[x, 2]
assert y == 1.25
answered Dec 19, 2020 at 15:43
You can use:
from decimal import Decimal, ROUND_HALF_UP
for i in range[1, 15, 2]:
n = i / 2
print[n, "=>", Decimal[str[n]].quantize[Decimal["1"], rounding=ROUND_HALF_UP]]
answered Oct 8, 2015 at 15:29
cdontscdonts
8,9183 gold badges42 silver badges70 bronze badges
A classical mathematical rounding without any libraries
def rd[x,y=0]:
''' A classical mathematical rounding by Voznica '''
m = int['1'+'0'*y] # multiplier - how many positions to the right
q = x*m # shift to the right by multiplier
c = int[q] # new number
i = int[ [q-c]*10 ] # indicator number on the right
if i >= 5:
c += 1
return c/m
Compare:
print[ round[0.49], round[0.51], round[0.5], round[1.5], round[2.5], round[0.15,1]] # 0 1 0 2 2 0.1
print[ rd[0.49], rd[0.51], rd[0.5], rd[1.5], rd[2.5], rd[0.15,1]] # 0 1 1 2 3 0.2
answered Dec 16, 2018 at 14:12
Knowing that round[9.99,0] rounds to int=10 and int[9.99] rounds to int=9 brings success:
Goal: Provide lower and higher round number depending on value
def get_half_round_numers[self, value]:
"""
Returns dict with upper_half_rn and lower_half_rn
:param value:
:return:
"""
hrns = {}
if not isinstance[value, float]:
print["Error>Input is not a float. None return."]
return None
value = round[value,2]
whole = int[value] # Rounds 9.99 to 9
remainder = [value - whole] * 100
if remainder >= 51:
hrns['upper_half_rn'] = round[round[value,0],2] # Rounds 9.99 to 10
hrns['lower_half_rn'] = round[round[value,0] - 0.5,2]
else:
hrns['lower_half_rn'] = round[int[value],2]
hrns['upper_half_rn'] = round[int[value] + 0.5,2]
return hrns
Some testing:
yw
answered Nov 9, 2019 at 18:54
gies0rgies0r
4,0551 gold badge35 silver badges43 bronze badges
import math
# round tossing n digits from the end
def my_round[n, toss=1]:
def normal_round[n]:
if isinstance[n, int]:
return n
intn, dec = str[n].split["."]
if int[dec[-1]] >= 5:
if len[dec] == 1:
return math.ceil[n]
else:
return float[intn + "." + str[int[dec[:-1]] + 1]]
else:
return float[intn + "." + dec[:-1]]
while toss >= 1:
n = normal_round[n]
toss -= 1
return n
for n in [1.25, 7.3576, 30.56]:
print[my_round[n, 2]]
1.0
7.36
31
answered Mar 26, 2020 at 11:06
LetzerWilleLetzerWille
5,2214 gold badges22 silver badges26 bronze badges
You can try this
def round[num]:
return round[num + 10**[-9]]
it will work since num = x.5 will always will be x.5 + 0.00...01 in the process which its closer to x+1 hence the round function will work properly and it will round x.5 to x+1
answered Jul 5, 2019 at 7:32
seVenVo1dseVenVo1d
3686 silver badges15 bronze badges
1