Several previous psychophysical and neurophysiological studies have investigated the separate effects of attention and adaptation on visual processing. Here, we investigated the combined effects of attention and adaptation on motion processing by measuring the effects of spatial attention on the duration of the motion after-effect [MAE] over a wide range of stimulus contrasts. MAE duration was compared between two conditions: full-attention, subjects were required to pay attention to the adapting motion stimulus, and poor-attention, subjects performed a difficult vowel detection task at the center of gaze and ignored the adapting motion stimulus. Attention was found to increase the MAE duration by a factor of 1.4, which was approximately constant over a wide range of stimulus contrasts [3.22–80.6%]. Notably, this included contrasts for which the MAE duration had reached its asymptotic value. We show that a quantitative model based on known properties of directionally selective MT neurons can explain these results by assuming that attention enhances the effects of adaptation, a phenomenon we refer to as “adaptation gain”. Specifically, attending to an adapting motion stimulus shifts the semi-saturation point [C50] of the underlying contrast response function [CRF] of motion detectors roughly 1.4-fold more to the right than does ignoring that same stimulus. By enhancing the effects of adaptation in this fashion, attention is predicted to enhance the adaptability of the visual motion system.
The motion aftereffect [MAE] provides a behavioural probe into the mechanisms underlying motion perception, and has been used to study the effects of attention on motion processing. Visual attention can enhance detection and discrimination of selected visual signals. However, the relationship between attention and motion processing remains contentious: not all studies find that attention increases MAEs. Our meta-analysis reveals several factors that explain superficially discrepant findings.
Across studies [37 independent samples, 76 effects] motion adaptation was significantly and substantially enhanced by attention [Cohen’s d = 1.12, p