Listening bias examples

Listening Biases: How Influencers Unwittingly Restrict Possibilities

• September 20, 2021
• Listening
• 20 Comments

Do you enter conversations to listen for what will confirm your assumptions? Do you assume the responses to your questions provide an accurate representation of the full fact pattern good data on which to base your follow-on questions? Do you assume your history of similar topics topicsgives you a more elevated understanding of what your Communication Partners [CPs] mean rather than what theyre actually saying?

If any of the above are true, yourebiasing your conversation.

• By entering conversations with assumptions and personal goals,
• and listening according to historic, unconscious, self-directed filters,
• you unwittingly direct conversations
• to your range of expectations and familiarity
• and potentially miss a more optimal outcome.

In other words, listening biased by your unconscious needs and assumptions keeps you from obtaining optimal results. But its not your fault.

OUR BRAINS CAUSE A GAP BETWEEN WHATS SAID AND WHATS HEARD

The most surprising takeaway from my year of research for mybookon closing the gap between whats said and whats heard was learning how little of what we think we hear is unbiased, or even accurate. Indeed, its pretty rare for us to hear precisely what another intends us to hear: our brains dont allow us to.

Employing assumptions, triggers, memory tricks, and habit our brains listen through our unconscious biases, causing us to unwittinglyalter the meaning that was actually intended.In fact and this is the scary part our brainsdont even tell uswhat they misheard or misrepresented, regardless of our desire to be neutral when listening, and regardless of how hard we try to listen carefully.

Sound actually enters our ears as chemical/electrical signals with no meaning; the signals seek the closest match among our synapses thats similar-enough. And whatever doesnt match exactly gets deleted. Unconsciously. Without us having any idea its occurring. We just assume that what our brains tell us is accurate. Indeed theres a good chance its merely some unknown fraction of accurate.

So your CP might say ABC and your brain tells you they said ABL without even mentioning it omitted D, E, F, etc. and just presenting the misinterpreted message as fact. I once lost a business partner because he heard me say X when three of us confirmed I said Y. I was right here! Why are you all lying to me! I KNOW she said that! And he walked out in a self-generated rage. His brain actually told him I said X, and three of us telling him he was mistaken didnt make a difference. This makes it tough for any communication where mutual understanding is so important.

Indeed, asoutsiders as sellers, or leaders, or influencers of any kind we cannot ever know our CPs innermost thinking. And given variances in our beliefs/values, background, identity, etc., and entering conversations with our own goals and unconscious biases,we cant accurately hearwhat our CP intends to conveyand end up unintentionallyrestricting the full range of viable outcomes. In other words, our natural inability to hear accurately causes us miscommunication and flawed understanding.Not to mention lost business and lost relationships.

Net net, we unwittingly base our conversation, goals, questions, intuitive responses and offerings on an assumption of what we think has been said, and succeed with clear communication only with those whose biases match our own. [Note: for those who want to manage this problem, Ive developed a work-around in Chapter 6 ofWhat?]

ENTERING CONVERSATIONS WITHOUT BIAS

I want to go back to the problems incurred by entering conversations with personal biases as they certainly restrict success:

1. by biasing the framework of the conversation to the goals we wish to achieve, we overlook alternative, congruent outcomes. Sellers, coaches, leaders, and managers often enter conversations with personal expectations and goals rather than collaboratively setting a viable frame and together discovering possibility.
2. by listening only for what were [consciously or unconsciously] focused on hearing, we overlook a broader range of possible outcomes. Sellers, negotiators, leaders, help desk professionals, and coaches often listen for what they want to hear so they can say what they want/are trained to say, or pose biased questions, and possibly miss real opportunities to promote agreement.

Here are some ideas to help you create conversations that avoid restriction:

1. Shift your goal as an influencer to facilitating the route to change.Youll never have the full fact pattern, or the weight and implications of each element that has created and maintains the status quo. But you can lead a route to change using systems thinking and enabling your CP to engage their own change, congruently.
2. Enter each conversation with a willingness to serve the greater good within the bounds of what you have to offer, rather than meet a specific outcome. Any expectations or goals limit outcomes. The Others outcome will become obvious to them.
3. Enter with a blank brain, as a neutral navigator,servant leader, change facilitator.
4. Trust that your CP has her own answers. Your job is to help her find them. This is particularly hard for coaches and leaders who believe they must influence the outcome toward a goal, or use their expertise to help the person change the way the influencer believes they should. [And yes, all influencers, sellers, leaders, negotiators, and coaches are guilty of this.] Ive written an article to specifically address this.
5. Stay away from data gathering. Yourbiased questionswill only extract biased answers. Use questions focused on enabling change because youll never gather the full fact pattern anyway. Neutral questions like What has stopped you from making the change before now? is an example of a question addressed to systemic change. [Note: Ive developedFacilitative Questions that eschew information gathering and lead systemic change through unconscious thinking patterns.]
6. Make enabling Others to discover their route to Excellence your goal, not a specific behavior you might deem important.
7. Get rid of your ego, your need to be right or smart or have the answers. Until your CP finds a way to recognizetheir ownunconscious issues, and design congruent change that matchestheir idiosyncratic givens, you arent helpful regardless of how much you think you know.

By listening with an ear that hears avenues to serve, to understand whats been said without unconscious bias, you can truly serve your Communication partner.

____________

Sharon-Drew Morgen is a breakthrough innovator and original thinker, having developed new paradigms in sales [inventor Buying Facilitation®, listening/communication [What? Did you really say what I think I heard?], change management [The How of Change], coaching, and leadership. She is the author of several books, including the NYTimes Business Bestseller Selling with Integrity and Dirty Little Secrets: why buyers cant buy and sellers cant sell]. Sharon-Drew coaches and consults with companies seeking out of the box remedies for congruent, servant-leader-based change in leadership, healthcare, and sales. Her award-winning blog carries original articles with new thinking, weekly. www.sharon-drew.com She can be reached at .