The supreme court ruled that the line-item veto is unconstitutional because
This Supreme Court case ruled that the Line Item Veto given to the President was unconstitutional under the Presentment Clause in the Constitution. It removed the power, given to the President from the Line Item Veto Act 1996. It is a power that numerous state governors still have. Show
Background to the Case: Congress passed the Line Item Veto Act in 1996 which gave the President the power to veto certain provisions within legislation that they did not agree with. The Line Item Veto focussed on finance bills. The passage of the act was also controversial with many Democrats not supporting it, so much so that six Congressmen sued to prevent the use of the procedure. The next case surrounding it were to do with injuries sustained by both potato growers and the City of New York through cancelled provisions within the Taxpayer Relief Act and Balanced Budget Act. Both claimed that when provisions were cancelled or vetoed it lead to problems in healthcare in New York and the tax benefits available to potato growers. When in court the District Court ruled that the Line Item Veto was unconstitutional and was progressed to the Supreme Court. The ruling: The Supreme Court affirmed the judgement of the lower court saying that the Line Item Veto violates the Presentment Clause in the Constitution. The ruling split the Court significantly with some justices both concurring and dissenting on the judgement. Despite the act being struck down, President George W Bush attempted to have it reinstated on the basis that it would remove wasteful spending. The proposed act was slightly different as it required a congressional vote on the item in question. The proposal failed to become law. On June 25, 1998, the United States Supreme Court in Clinton, et al. v. C ity of New York, et al., held that the Line Item Veto Act, violated the Presentment Clause of the Constitution. The Clause requires that every bill which has passed the House and Senate before becoming law must be presented to the President for approval or veto, but is silent on whether the President may amend or repeal provisions of bills that have passed the House and Senate in identical form. The Court interpreted silence on this issue as equivalent to an express prohibition. The Court concluded that the Line Item Veto Act unconstitutionally empowered the President unilaterally to repeal or amend provisions of duly enacted bills. Nonvetoed items that emerged as law were truncated versions of bills that passed both Houses of Congress, but not the product of the finely wrought procedure for lawmaking designed by the Framers of the Constitution. For background information on the line item veto issue, see the Guide to CRS Products under Budgets-Process. This report will not be updated. Order Code 98-690 A CRS-2 CRS-3 CRS-4 CRS-5 CRS-6 EveryCRSReport.com Why did the Supreme Court declared the lineSupreme Court of the United States ruled that the line-item veto as granted in the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 was unconstitutional because it impermissibly gave the President the power to unilaterally amend or repeal parts of bills that had been appropriately passed by the United States Congress.
When was the lineCongress granted this power to the president by the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 to control "pork barrel spending", but in 1998 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the act to be unconstitutional in a 6–3 decision in Clinton v. City of New York.
What is a lineThe Line Item Veto Act Pub. L. 104–130 (text) (PDF) was a federal law of the United States that granted the President the power to line-item veto budget bills passed by Congress, but its effect was brief as the act was soon ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Clinton v. City of New York.
What does the lineThe Line Item Veto? The Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130, allowed the President, within five days (excluding Sundays) after signing a bill, to cancel in whole three types of revenue provisions within the bill. The cancellation would take effect upon receipt by Congress of a special message from the President.
What is the lineA line-item veto or partial veto, granted by the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, gave the president unilateral power to nullify, cancel or repeal parts of legislation passed by the United States Congress, and to sign the rest of the proposed bill in its original state, making it the law.
What is lineThe line-item veto, also called the partial veto, is a special form of veto power that authorizes a chief executive to reject particular provisions of a bill enacted by a legislature without vetoing the entire bill. Many countries have different standards for invoking the line-item veto if it exists at all.
|