What kind of trial has only a judge to determine innocence or guilt and sentencing?

journal article

Review: [Untitled]

Reviewed Work: Conviction: The Determination of Guilt or Innocence without Trial by Donald J. Newman

Review by: Robert L. Weinberg , Barbara Allen Babcock

The Yale Law Journal

Vol. 76, No. 3 (Jan., 1967)

, pp. 612-622 (11 pages)

Published By: The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.

https://doi.org/10.2307/794976

https://www.jstor.org/stable/794976

Journal Information

The Yale Law Journal publishes original scholarly work in all fields of law and legal study. The journal contains articles, essays, and book reviews written by professors and legal practitioners throughout the world, and slightly shorter notes and comments written by individual journal staff members. The journal is published monthly from October through June with the exception of February.

Publisher Information

For over a century, the Yale Law Journal has been at the forefront of legal scholarship, sparking conversation and encouraging reflection among scholars and students, as well as practicing lawyers and sitting judges and Justices. The Journal strives to shape discussion of the most important and relevant legal issues through a rigorous scholarship selection and editing process.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
The Yale Law Journal © 1967 The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.
Request Permissions

What kind of trial has only a judge to determine innocence or guilt and sentencing?

If you face a criminal charge and possible trial, you may be wondering about the difference between an acquittal and a “not guilty” verdict. Let our experienced criminal defense lawyers help you.

First, keep in mind that courts don’t rule that anyone “innocent.” Instead, they only rule that a defendant is “not guilty.” Being not guilty and being innocent, as you’ll see below, aren’t necessarily the same thing.

What Does “Acquitted” Mean, Exactly?

Essentially, a verdict of not guilty is an acquittal. If a jury or judge finds you not guilty of a criminal charge, you are acquitted and your case is closed. If you’re found guilty of a charge, you are said to be convicted and must face the penalties imposed for the crime, though you have the option to appeal. In this way, a conviction is the opposite of an acquittal.

But an acquittal doesn’t mean the jury or judge found you innocent of the charge. It only means that the prosecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you were guilty.

A not guilty verdict isn’t the sole means of getting an acquittal. A trial judge or an appeals court can also determine that the evidence of guilt presented by the prosecution wasn’t sufficient, and then acquit the defendant.

Normally, the prosecution cannot appeal an acquittal and you’re free of the charge when acquitted. This involves Americans’ constitutional protections against “double jeopardy,” or being tried twice for the same crime.

However, under the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure there is one exception: “if the defendant shall have been acquitted upon trial in a court having no jurisdiction of the offense.” In this case, the defendant may be prosecuted again in a court having the proper jurisdiction.

Keep in mind that a judge or jury can find you “not guilty” on some but not all counts of the charge or charges against you. In that case, it would constitute a partial acquittal, and you still could face penalties on the counts for which you were convicted.

Differences Between Charges Being Dismissed vs. Dropped

Another possibility is that your case is “dismissed.” Dismissing a charge can only be done by the prosecutor or a judge after the case has been filed. Often, that occurs due to insufficient evidence against the defendant.

If a case is dismissed, that means the court found no need to conduct a trial at that time. But there’s a chance the case could be filed for trial at a later time, since dismissing a case before trial isn’t the same as acquitting the defendant in a trial, and it doesn’t fall under the double jeopardy rule.

Yet another possibility is that the charge or charges against you may be dropped before trial. Dropping and dismissing a charge are two different things.

A prosecutor or arresting officer can decide to drop a charge brought against a defendant — or perhaps reduce the charge to a lesser offense — perhaps even before the charge is formally filed.

Why would a case be dropped?

It may be due to lack of sufficient evidence or discovering new evidence or testimony which contradicts the arrest. Or, a charge may be dropped if evidence is found to be inadmissible or a violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights.

Contrary to popular belief, the victim in a criminal case cannot decide to drop a charge. However, a victim’s change of heart or decision not to cooperate could prompt a prosecutor to do so.

Hire a Houston Criminal Defense Attorney for the Best Possible Outcome

Beyond these measures, a defendant may also accept a plea bargain or seek a mistrial. Indeed, there are many ways a case can be resolved which may benefit the defendant.

As a defendant, you shouldn’t sit back and hope that your charge is dropped, reduced or dismissed. You should engage a knowledgeable criminal defense lawyer to look for reasons why that should happen and then present them to the prosecutor or judge.

Contact the Neal Davis Law Firm today and let us help. We’ll start by providing you a legal review of your case. Then, you can decide how to proceed.

Just remember: The difference between an acquittal and a conviction is huge, and your future may be at stake.

Who determines guilt and innocence in most criminal cases?

After being charged, the jury deliberates, the process of deciding whether a defendant is guilty or not guilty. During this process, no one associated with the trial can contact the jury without the judge and lawyers.

Who will determines the guilt or innocence of the accused?

The prosecutor must prove that the accused is guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt.” At the end of the trial, if the prosecutor has not presented enough evidence, or if the judge or jury still has a reasonable doubt about whether the accused committed the crime, he must be found not guilty.