A legislative committee reviews the overall effectiveness of a state parks program in Texas

The Legislative/Regulatory Committee reviews, analyzes and recommends positions on state legislation that affects the goals and objectives of the Section and its membership. The Committee, as well as the Managing Director, directs the Section’s legislative advocate and leads all California Section activity in the state regulatory arena. The Committee is governed by its guidelines.

WRCA Responds to 2022 Legislation on Water Recycling

It has been a busy legislative session thus far and WateReuse California [WRCA] is active in the state capitol advancing and protecting the interest of water reuse. See below for the bills WRCA is following. Contact Jennifer West at if you are a member would like to participate in the WRCA Legislative-Regulatory Committee meetings

Bill NumberTitleWRCA Position Letters [see below]
AB 1845 [Calderon] Design Build Support
AB 2387 [E. Garcia] Climate Bond Watch
AB 2787 [Quirk] Microbeads/microplastics Support
AB 2811 [Bennett] Onsite reuse/dual plumbing Oppose Unless Amended
SB 12 [McGuire & Stern] Local Government: Planning and Zoning Watch
SB 230 [Portantino] CEC Program Support
SB 991 [Newman] Design Build Support
 SB 1144 [Wiener] Graywater Seek Amendments
SB 1157 [Hertzberg] Indoor Residential Water Use Standard Oppose Unless Amended
SB 1197 [Caballero] Water Innovation Support
AB 2247 [Bloom] PFAS Source Database Support

Legislative and Regulatory Letters

2021-222019-202017-18

  • AB 2811 Letter [March 25, 2022]
  • WateReuse California AB2787 Letter [March 24, 2022]
  • WateReuse California AB 2247 Letter [March 22, 2022]
  • SB 991 GF Letter [March 15, 2022]
  • Recycled Water Budget Request Letter [March 14, 2022]
  • SB 1197 NRW Letter [March 14, 2022]
  • SB 1157 OUA Coalition Letter Final [March 11, 2022]
  • Letter urging inclusion of $750 million for water recycling grants into the Water Resilience Drought Funding Package included in the FY 2021/2022 budget

  • Comment Letter — Draft FY 2020-2021 CWSRF IUP [June 9, 2020]
  • Comment Letter — Governor Gavin Newsom’s 2020 draft Water Resilience Portfolio [February 6, 2020]
  • Direct Potable Reuse Testimony –  Jennifer West [November 5, 2019]
  • Comment Letter – Direct Potable Reuse [DPR] Framework Second Edition[October 8, 2019]
  • Comment Letter – June 18, 2019 Board Meeting – FY 2019-20 CWSRF IUP [May 28, 2019]
  • SB 332 [Hertzberg/Wiener] — Oppose Unless Amended [April 16, 2019]
  • WRCA Letter to Senator Feinstein and Congressman Calvert [April 8, 2019]
  • SB 332 [Hertzberg/Wiener] — Oppose Unless Amended [March 25, 2019]
  • AB 292 [Quirk] — Support, Potable Reuse Terminology [February 26, 2019]
  • Comment Letter — Policy for Water Quality Control for Recycled Water [February 11, 2019]

  • Comment Letter — Adopted Recycled Water Policy [December 11, 2018]
  • Comment Letter – Proposed Recycled Water Policy Amendment [June 26, 2018]
  • Comment Letter — Board Meeting – CWSRF Policy Amendment [October 19, 2018]
  • Comment Letter — A Proposed Framework for Regulating Direct Potable Reuse in California [May 18, 2018]
  • Comment Letter — FY 2018 Clean Water State Revolving Fund Intended Use Plan [May 9, 2018]
  • SB 1489 [Stern] Bond Monies — Support letter [April 18, 2018]
  • SB 966[Wiener] Support in Concept [March 22, 2018]
  • Comment Letter – “Changes to Proposed Regulation Prohibiting Wasteful Water Use Practices” [February 13, 2018]
  • Comment Letter – “Waste and Unreasonable Water Uses” regulations [December 13, 2017]
  • Comment Letter –CWSRF Leveraging– October 3, 2017 Board Meeting [September 27, 2017]
  • Comment Letter – Proposed Surface Water Augmentation Regulations
  • Comments on June 16, 2017 – Second Revised Draft of Water Audits and Water Loss
    Control Reporting Regulations [July 3, 2017]
  • AB 574 – Support, As amended June 20, 2017 [June 27, 2017]
  • WateReuse California Comments on CWSRF Intended Use Plan [May 19, 2017]
  • AB 2282 Implementation –Proposed Amendments to the California Plumbing Code and California Green Building Standards Code [May 1, 2017]
  • SB 740 – On-Site Water Reuse Systems [April 11, 2017]
  • AB 574 – Potable Reuse, Support [March 27, 2017]
    • Potable Reuse – Newly Defined Types
  • WateReuse California Legislative Principles for Recycled Water under State of California Emergency Conservation Regulations and Proposed Long-term Conservation Framework [March 24, 2017]
  • SB 5 – California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access For All Act of 2018, Support [February 28, 2017]

Committee Schedule

There are no upcoming events to display at this time.

Subscribe to filtered calendar

Join WateReuse

WateReuse is the only trade association that focuses solely on advancing laws, policy and funding to increase water reuse. Our niche strategy sets us apart from other organizations in the water industry.

Join Today

When evaluating welfare reforms in Texas which of the following statements is correct?

When evaluating welfare reforms in Texas, which of the following statements is CORRECT? Judged by changes in the number of people on welfare, welfare reforms have been a success.

What was Texas's response to the Affordable Care Act quizlet?

When the Affordable Care Act ["Obamacare"] became law, states could opt to expand their Medicaid programs or refuse. Texas refused - and refused $100 billion in federal funding over a 10-year period.

Which of the following is related to the Edgewood v Kirby court case in Texas?

8] What was the central issue in Edgewood v. Kirby? The texas supreme court ruled in the case that the states system of financing public education violated the texas constitution.

What was the result of the Texas Supreme Court ruling in the 1989 Edgewood vs Kirby quizlet?

In Edgewood Independent School District v. Kirby [1989], The Texas Supreme Court ruled: that Texas' system of school financing was unconstitutional.

Chủ Đề