Price and performance details for the AMD Ryzen 3 2200U can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.
- The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common [single] CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
- The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
- The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.
Is the AMD Ryzen 3 2200U Good for Gaming?
This is a fairly old CPU that is no longer competitive with newer CPUs. But this CPU contains 2 Cores and 4 Threads. This CPU may not do well with games especially more recent releases. Best to check with your system requirements from the developer of the games you are interested to see if it is compatible. []
CPU Test Suite Average Results for AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Integer Math12,262 MOps/Sec Floating Point Math6,190 MOps/Sec Find Prime Numbers10 Million Primes/Sec Random String Sorting5,751 Thousand Strings/Sec Data Encryption3,171 MBytes/Sec Data Compression47,251 KBytes/Sec Physics244 Frames/Sec Extended Instructions1,787 Million Matrices/Sec Single Thread1,685 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 7th of March 2024.
CPU Mark Distribution for AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 2nd of March 2024
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 2nd of March 2024. For distribution graph only: Results are trimmed to exclude outliers by disregarding the bottom 1% and top 1% of submissions.
Search for AMD Ryzen 3 2200U from the Featured Merchants below:
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
Chúng tôi so sánh hai CPU máy tính xách tay: AMD Ryzen 3 2200U với 2 nhân 2.5GHz và Intel Core i3 1215U với 6 nhân 1.2GHz. Bạn sẽ tìm hiểu xem bộ xử lý nào hoạt động tốt hơn trong các bài kiểm tra đánh giá, thông số kỹ thuật chính, tiêu thụ năng lượng và nhiều hơn nữa.
Khác biệt chính
AMD Ryzen 3 2200ULợi thế
Tần số cơ sở cao hơn [2.5GHz so với 1.2GHz]
Intel Core i3 1215ULợi thế
Phát hành trễ 4 năm và 1 tháng
Hiệu suất card đồ họa tốt hơn
Bộ nhớ cấu hình cao hơn [LPDDR5-5200 so với DDR4-2400]
Băng thông bộ nhớ lớn hơn [76.8GB/s so với 35.76GB/s]
Phiên bản PCIe mới hơn [4.0 so với 3.0]
Dung lượng bộ nhớ cache L3 lớn hơn [10MB so với 4MB]
Điểm số
Tiêu chuẩn
Cinebench R23 Đơn lõi
Hiệu suất Cores tiết kiệm năng lượng
AMD started Ryzen 3 2200U sales 26 October 2017. This is a Raven Ridge architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 14 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3400 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket FP5 processor with a TDP of 15 Watt. It supports DDR4 Dual-channel memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at 2.32% of a leader's which is AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
Ryzen ThreadripperPRO 7995WX
Compare
General info
Ryzen 3 2200U processor market type [desktop or notebook], architecture, sales start time and pricing.
Place in performance rankingPlace by popularitynot in top-100Market segmentLaptopSeriesAMD Ryzen 3Architecture codenameRaven Ridge [2017−2018]Release date26 October 2017 [6 years old]Current price$549 of 17802 [Threadripper PRO 7995WX]
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
Physical cores2 [Dual-core]Threads4Base clock speed2.5 GHzof 4.7 [FX-9590]Boost clock speed3.4 GHzof 6 [Core i9-13900KS]L1 cache128K [per core]of 7475.2 [Apple M2 Pro 10-Core]L2 cache512K [per core]of 36864 [Apple M2 Max]L3 cache4 MB [shared]of 768 [EPYC 7373X]Chip lithography14 nmof 3 [Apple M3 Max 16-Core]Die size246 mm2Number of transistors4950 Millionof 9900000 [Ryzen 5 7645HX]64 bit support+Windows 11 compatibility-
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 2200U compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard [look for socket type], power supply unit [look for power consumption] etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTAES-NI+AVX+
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200U's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelof 5600 [Ryzen 9 7940HS]Maximum memory size32 GBof 786 [Xeon E5-2670 v3]Max memory channels2of 12 [Xeon Platinum 9221]Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sof 460.8 [EPYC 9124]ECC memory support+
Graphics specifications
General parameters of a GPU integrated into Ryzen 3 2200U.
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Ryzen 3 2200U. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 [standing for Release 15] is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version [sometimes called Single-Thread] only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
x264 encoding pass 1
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD [720p] video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Geekbench 2
Benchmark coverage: 5%
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Gaming performance
Relative perfomance
Overall Ryzen 3 2200U performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.
Intel equivalent
According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to Ryzen 3 2200U is Core i7-6650U, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 6 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen 3 2200U:
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended GPUs
People consider these graphics cards to be good for Ryzen 3 2200U, according to our PC configuration statistics.
These are the fastest graphics cards for Ryzen 3 2200U in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 6356 configurations based on Ryzen 3 2200U in our database.
User ratings: view and submit
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Rate AMD Ryzen 3 2200U on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.