Geforce mx130 và geforce 930m so sánh năm 2024
|
@bobo5552001Xời, máy chip HQ có 2 quạt tản nhiệt, mát hơn nhiều, mọi người cứ bảo chip HQ nóng, chip HQ chạy ứng dụng văn phòng thì mát như chip U, chạy giả lập nặng, chip HQ xung cao sẵn nên nhiệt độ tăng ko đáng kể, trong khi chip U xung thấp chạy giả lập thì ép xung hết công suất, nóng hơn cả chip HQ, mà lại 1 quạt tản nhiệt nên bên trong còn nóng hơn nữa, máy chip U nhanh tã hơn chip HQ nhiều , mình xài i7 QM đời 2013 đến giờ vẫn chạy nhanh, mượt mà, ổn định trong khi thằng bạn thay 2 đời máy chip U rồi, đem chip U treo giả lập chưa đến năm đã hỏng bung bét vì tản nhiệt 1 quạt yếu đuối. Bạn lên nhattao.com tìm mua sẽ thấy đa phần laptop được rao bán là máy chip U, nóng, tã, yếu, chứ ít khi có máy chip QM, MQ, HQ được cá nhân rao bán. Bản thân máy dùng chip HQ có tản nhiệt tốt và chất lượng linh kiện cao cấp hơn, được sản xuất để chạy nặng nên đồ bền hơn hẳn chip U Show
Chúng tôi so sánh hai GPU Nền tảng di động: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX130 và 2GB VRAM GeForce 930MX để xem GPU nào có hiệu suất tốt hơn trong các thông số kỹ thuật chính, kiểm tra đánh giá, tiêu thụ điện năng, v.v. In this comparison between GeForce 930M and GeForce MX130 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 930M will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX130 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice. GeForce 930M and GeForce MX130 are Laptop Graphics CardsNote: GeForce 930M and GeForce MX130 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 930M or GeForce MX130 here: General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores384384Core clock speed1122 MHz928 MHzBoost clock speed1242 MHz941 MHzManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption (TDP)15-25 Watt33 WattTexture fill rate29.8122.58Floating-point performance953.9 gflops722.7 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on GeForce MX130 and GeForce 930M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Laptop sizemedium sizedno dataBus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5DDR3Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GBMemory bus width64 Bit64 BitMemory clock speed5012 MHz1800 MHzMemory bandwidth40.1 GB/s14.4 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. GPU Boostno data2.0Optimus++GameWorksno data+ API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.64.5OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126CUDA++ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GeForce MX130 4.79 +83.5% MX130 outperforms 930M by 84% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% GeForce MX130 1858 +83.6% MX130 outperforms 930M by 84% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% GeForce MX130 11968 +64.5% MX130 outperforms 930M by 65% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% GeForce MX130 2875 +33.5% MX130 outperforms 930M by 34% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% GeForce MX130 2345 +60.6% MX130 outperforms 930M by 61% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% GeForce MX130 13610 +63.8% MX130 outperforms 930M by 64% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. GeekBench 5 OpenCLGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% GeForce MX130 6398 +22.5% MX130 outperforms 930M by 22% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. GeekBench 5 VulkanGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% GeForce MX130 4908 +13.1% MX130 outperforms 930M by 13% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. GeekBench 5 CUDAGeekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% GeForce MX130 6872 +34.1% MX130 outperforms 930M by 34% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 20774 5−6 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey9−10 +200% 3−4 −200% Assassin's Creed Valhalla2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Battlefield 514−16 +180% 5−6 −180% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare16−18 +33.3% 12−14 −33.3% Cyberpunk 20778−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Far Cry 514 +367% 3−4 −367% Far Cry New Dawn10−11 +233% 3−4 −233% Forza Horizon 416−18 +100% 8−9 −100% Hitman 310−11 +150% 4−5 −150% Horizon Zero Dawn11 +267% 3−4 −267% Red Dead Redemption 29−10 +50% 6−7 −50% Shadow of the Tomb Raider13 +62.5% 8−9 −62.5% Watch Dogs: Legion11 0−1 Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey9−10 +200% 3−4 −200% Assassin's Creed Valhalla2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Battlefield 514−16 +180% 5−6 −180% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare16−18 +33.3% 12−14 −33.3% Cyberpunk 20778−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Far Cry 513 +333% 3−4 −333% Far Cry New Dawn10−11 +233% 3−4 −233% Forza Horizon 416−18 +100% 8−9 −100% Hitman 310−11 +150% 4−5 −150% Horizon Zero Dawn8−9 +167% 3−4 −167% Metro Exodus3 +0% 3−4 +0% Red Dead Redemption 29−10 +50% 6−7 −50% Shadow of the Tomb Raider12−14 +50% 8−9 −50% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt14 +55.6% 9 −55.6% Watch Dogs: Legion5−6 0−1 Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey9−10 +200% 3−4 −200% Assassin's Creed Valhalla2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Battlefield 514−16 +180% 5−6 −180% Cyberpunk 20778−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Far Cry 512 +300% 3−4 −300% Far Cry New Dawn10−11 +233% 3−4 −233% Forza Horizon 416−18 +100% 8−9 −100% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt7 +0% 7 +0% Watch Dogs: Legion5−6 0−1 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare8−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Hitman 38−9 +60% 5−6 −60% Horizon Zero Dawn10−11 +25% 8−9 −25% Metro Exodus3−4 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 23−4 +200% 1−2 −200% Shadow of the Tomb Raider7−8 +40% 5−6 −40% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey2−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Cyberpunk 20772−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Far Cry 57−8 +133% 3−4 −133% Far Cry New Dawn4−5 +100% 2−3 −100% Forza Horizon 47−8 +250% 2−3 −250% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt3−4 +200% 1−2 −200% Watch Dogs: Legion0−1 0−1 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare3−4 +50% 2−3 −50% Hitman 35−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Horizon Zero Dawn7−8 +16.7% 6−7 −16.7% Red Dead Redemption 22−3 +100% 1−2 −100% Shadow of the Tomb Raider1−2 0−1 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt0−1 0−1 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2 0−1 Assassin's Creed Valhalla1−2 0−1 Cyberpunk 20770−1 0−1 Far Cry 55−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Far Cry New Dawn7−8 +16.7% 6−7 −16.7% Forza Horizon 45−6 +150% 2−3 −150% This is how GeForce MX130 and GeForce 930M compete in popular games: 1080p resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 4.79 2.61 Recency 1 January 2018 12 March 2015 Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB Memory bandwidth 40.1 14.4 Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 33 Watt The GeForce MX130 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 930M in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce MX130 GeForce 930M Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce MX130 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce 930M on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. How does a GeForce MX130 compare to a GeForce 930mx?This is how GeForce MX130 and GeForce 930MX compete in popular games: Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games: in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX130 is 400% faster than the GeForce 930MX. Is Nvidia GeForce MX130 a graphics card?The Nvidia GeForce MX130 is a mid-range laptop graphics card with DirectX 12 support (FL 11_0) based on the older Maxwell architecture. It is a renamed GeForce 940MX and was announced in late 2017. It can be equipped with fast GDDR5 or slower DDR3 graphics memory. Is a GeForce MX130 faster than a 930mx in Cyberpunk 2077?in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX130 is 400% faster than the GeForce 930MX. in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GeForce 930MX is 60% faster than the GeForce MX130. Reviewed processors performance compared to Fortnite system requirements. What is Nvidia GeForce 930m?The NVIDIA GeForce 930M (sometimes also called Nvidia GeForce GT 930M) is a (lower) mid-range, DirectX 11-compatible graphics card for laptops unveiled in March 2015. It is based on the last years GeForce 840M. In addition to the "normal" 25 Watt 930M, there is also a low power variant with a TDP of 12 Watt and support for DDR3 and GDDR5. |
