What is the different between deontological theory and consequentialist approach?
Would you tell a lie to protect someone from harm? Would you sign off on torture to prevent a bomb attack? If you want to look into the ethical aspects of personal and political decisions, you need to start with the basics, and one of the most basic ideas in moral philosophy is the distinction between consequentialism and deontology. These two schools of ethics identify different aspects of decisions as morally important, and lead to very different ways of looking at ethical issues — including freedom and liberty. Show
ConsequentialismConsequentialism tells us to judge decisions by the goodness of their outcomes (or consequences). If there are two (or more) options to choose from, the one with the better (or best) outcome is the morally right choice to make. This is too vague, however, because it doesn’t tell us what about outcomes makes one choice “better” than others. Once we narrow down what “good” or “better”
means, we get specific versions of consequentialism based on a particular definition of goodness. DeontologyThis is the kind of judgment that a deontologist would make. Deontology finds moral value in an act itself rather than the outcome it leads to. Deontology is usually expressed in rules, principles, or duties that proclaim certain acts to be moral or not. The Good versus the RightDespite their differences, consequentialists and deontologists do agree on many things, such as the immorality of lying, stealing, and killing. More important, however, they
do so for different reasons that stem from their unique perspectives. Liberty and EthicsBoth ethical approaches have also been used to support individual liberty, but again for different reasons. Consequentialists focus on the wealth and happiness that free markets and societies create, while deontologists emphasize the greater respect for the rights and dignity of individuals that
liberty promotes.
Mark D. WhiteProfessor, College of Staten Island In 2013, Professor White became the founding chair of the Department of Philosophy after it split from the Department of Political Science, Economics, and Philosophy (of which he had been a member since 1998 and chair since 2011) at the College of Staten Island. Professor White teaches courses in the… What are the differences between consequentialism deontology and virtue ethics?Consequentialism. Consequentialist theories, unlike virtue and deontological theories, hold that only the consequences, or outcomes, of actions matter morally. According to this view, acts are deemed to be morally right solely on the basis of their consequences.
What are some differences between consequentialist and Nonconsequentialist deontological theories of right and wrong?Consequentialist and non-consequentialist views disagree about morality. Consequentialists say that moral goodness is about what effects an action brings about; non-consequentialists say that moral goodness is about whether an action follows certain duties or rules.
What is the difference between non consequentialist or deontological and consequentialist normative moral theories?There are two broad schools of ethical theory: consequentialism and non-consequentialism. According to consequentialism, the right act is that act which has the best consequences. According to non-consequentialism, the rightness of an action is not solely determined by its consequences.
What is the approach of deontological theory?Deontology is an ethical theory that says actions are good or bad according to a clear set of rules. Its name comes from the Greek word deon, meaning duty. Actions that align with these rules are ethical, while actions that don't aren't.
|