What is the reverse of a two digit number?
Let us observe the sum of a 2-digit number and a number formed by reversing its digits. Show 23 + 32 = 55 63 + 36 = 99 43 + 34 = 77 21 + 12 = 33 26 + 62 = 88. Notice that all the numbers are divisible by 11. Now, are all such numbers divisible by 11? Theorem: The sum of 2-digit numbers whose digits are reversed is divisible by 11. Explanation and Proof All 2-digit numbers with digits a and b can be written as 10a + b. For example, 34 = 10(2) + 4 (a = 3, b = 4) In effect, when the digits are reversed, the number become 10b + a. 43 = 10(4) + 3 So, in general, we have 10a + b: number So, adding the two numbers we have 10a + b + 10b + a = 11a + 11b = 11(a + b). As we can see, 11 is a factor of 11(a + b). Therefore, 11(a + b) is divisible by 11. So, the sum of a 2-digit numbers and the same number with its digit reversed is divisible by 11. Reversible numbers, or more specifically pairs of reversible numbers, are whole numbers in which the digits of one number are the reverse of the digits in another number, for example, 2847 and 7482 form a reversible pair. Reversible pairs prove interesting because of the unexpected way in which they allow addition and subtraction to be carried out — a way that facilitates mental arithmetic. This is best illustrated with a couple of examples. AdditionTake a reversible pair such as and The addition of these two numbers can in this case be performed quite simply by taking the sum of the two digits and multiplying it by 11:Let’s try this again with the pair andSubtractionSubtraction is carried out in a similar fashion, except the difference between the two digits is taken and the result multiplied by 9. For example, in subtracting from we haveSimilarly, for and we haveIt works like magic. But why? The underlying theoryAny positive whole number which is less than is written with two digits :Its reverse is therefore For example, if and we have andThe sum of and then, isSimilarly, their difference is The result also holds if is a number that ends in such as In this case,Triple digit numbersDoes something similar work for triple digit numbers? We can use the same method as above to derive the corresponding equations. A positive whole number with the digits is equal toIts reverse will therefore be For the sum we get For the difference we get The equation for the sum looks more complicated than for double digit numbers, but the equation for the difference preserves the same degree of simplicity. The trouble is that it doesn’t really make the mental arithmetic easier as it now involves multiplying by 99. There is another neat trick, however: simply treat the first and last digits as though they formed a two digit number. First, find the difference using the equation for a two digit number, that is, and then place a nine between the two digits (assume a leading zero if necessary).As an example, consider and As we saw above, the difference between the two digit numbers and is Now drop a in the middle to giveThe last step can be justified by factorising the coefficient of the equation for the difference. Since is a multiple of the sum of its digits will also be (that’s a fact you can easily verify). We now resort to a short-cut for multiplying by 11 that you might have heard of: split the two digits (in this case of ) and place their sum between them. As we have just seen, that sum is which justifies our trick above.The general caseCan we extend these results to numbers with more digits? In the case of a four-digit reversible number the equations becomeand For a general -digit number, written as the equations areand This looks a lot more complicated. There are limits, then, as to how far we can go in finding the sum and difference of two reversible numbers this way. But that does not detract from its usefulness within those limits! Further readingFind out more about reversible numbers in Michael P. Greaney's Little book of reversible numbers. About the authorMichael P. Greaney is a writer with particular interests in astronomy and mathematics. Apart from the Little book of reversible numbers, he has written articles for a number of astronomical magazines and was a contributing author to the book Observing and Measuring Visual Double Stars (Springer, 2012). Read more about... arithmetic CommentsI've been trying to think of a method to decompose a number into a number which, added to its reverse, equals that first number. For example 685 decomposes into 392+293, but I only know that because I started with 392 arbitrarily. Do you or anyone know of a quick sure method to start with a number like 685 and find 392? Chris G
Firstly, not all numbers have reversible components, e.g. 125. Michael Greaney for your reply. However while it certainly added to my understanding of the topic, your method yielded no solution for any number that I pulled randomly out of the air, such as 341, 724, 651, 873 (like your example of 125). No doubt I'd have eventually hit on one, but it leads to the questions: what proportion of 3-digit numbers are decomposable this way, and is there a way of knowing in advance? Interesting that my example 685 has three reversible components (not four as you say unless I've left something out), but applying your formula to it also yields 689 and 788 for k = 7 and 9. These are the two the 3-digit Lychrel (candidate) seed numbers, which I'm also interested in. Also 651/2 = 325.5, which reversed and added a couple of times gives 651.156, which could be regarded as a fair approximation, would you say? Maybe that's the beginning of an alternative method. |